USA
Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 43394 | Mean autmn departure date | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 4 | Decorah Iowa | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | Summer: 27050, winter: 12773, year: 37072, breeding: 6942, unknown status: 67202 | ha | NR | Not Reported | Summer: 11, winter: 4, year: 4, breeding: 2, unknown status: 2 | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Summer: 18567, winter: 3814 year: 27625, breeding: 1274, unknown status: 52551 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | California Counties | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | kg | NR | Adult | 2 | Pettigrew Science Center, Griffith Park | Exposure Factor Datasets | Los Angeles | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 4159 | 50% kernel | ha | NR | Both Adults and Juveniles | 4 | Savanah River | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 1396 |
Vesper Bat (Myotis yumanensis)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Fat (total or %) | Fat index increase | % fat/g lean dry weight | F | Adult | Exposure Factor Datasets | Before departure to maternity roost | USA |
Snowy Egret (Egretta thula)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1008 | Annual abundance | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Galveston Bay Estuary | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 581 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | Percent biomass | % | Nestling | 113 | Everglades | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Hatching or Parturition | See citation Figure 3 | Julian date of hatching | Julian date | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 4 | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Hatching Success | See citation Figure 5 | Percent hatching success | % | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of nests | No. nests | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 3 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 60 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.56 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 3.1 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 49 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.52 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.7 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 11 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.65 | |
Hatching Success | Clutch size 2: 94.3, 3: 94.3, 4: 90.9 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Clutch size 2: 3, 3: 41: 4: 11 nests | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1989: 90, 1998: 87, 1999: 94 | Active nests before/after oil spill in 1990 | No. of active nests | B | Adult | See citation | Isle of Meadows in Arthur Kill | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | 75 | New York City area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | 75 | Witchita area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 1 | Breeding pairs on islands in Boston Harbor | No. pairs | B | Adult | 2002: 66, 2003: 58 | Islands in Boston Harbor | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 53 | d | B | Chick | 20 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 3.7 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 0.919 | Weekly estimated survival rate | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.038 | ||
Survival/ Mortality | 0.833 | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.042 | |||
Foraging Distance | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 31 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | Review | Age at dispersal | d | B | Juvenile | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Clutch or Litter Size | Eggs/nest | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 56.3 | Chick age at dispersal | d | B | Chick | 22 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 5.6 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Hatching or Parturition | April 13-23: 45, April 24-May 1: 16, May 2-21: 10 | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Time of Nesting | See citation Table 3 | Days between eggs laid | Days | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.9 | No. eggs laid March 23-May 2 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 77 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.06 |
Time of Hatching or Parturition | 22.1 | Incubation period | Days | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.17 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 28.8 | Mortality from laying through 10 d | % | Nestling | 65 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 42.5 | Mortality from laying through 2 w | % | Nestling | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Hatching Success | 82 | % | Embryo | 226 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 1989: 95.3, 1990: 92.7 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 1989: 92.0, 1990: 93.0 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.553, 1990: 0.335 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.626, 1990: 0.587 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Territory Size | Day 5: 97.0, days 15-45: 121.3, day 60: 124.9 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 8 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 66.7, days 15-45: 61.5, day 60: 53.9 |
Territory Size | Day 5: 37.2, day 15: 50.6, days 30-60: 52.5 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 11 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 30.2, day 15: 35.6, days 30-60: 39.4 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of active nests | Adult | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | ||
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 6 | Mean annual nest survivorship | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Figure 7 | Young in successful nests | Nestling | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.18, Outer Coast-a: 1.82, Outer coast-b: 1.75, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.49, San Pablo Bay-b: 2.46, Russian River-a: 2.37, Russian River-b: 2.38 | Mean young fledged in successful nests | Fledglings | Fledgling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.135, Outer Coast-a: 0.076, Outer coast-b: 0.086, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.059, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.046, Russian River-a: 0.060, Russian River-b: 0.048 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.03, Outer Coast-a: 1.27, Outer coast-b: 1.60, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.09, San Pablo Bay-b: 1.54, Russian River-a: 1.66, Russian River-b: 1.75 | Mean young produced in successful nests | Young | Nestling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.236, Outer Coast-a: 0.073, Outer coast-b: 0.193, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.119, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.136, Russian River-a: 0.103, Russian River-b: 0.128 | |
Time of Nesting | See citation Figure 10 | Intraseasonal nesting activity indexed by mean % nests | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 62 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 316 | Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 66 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 128 | Blackfoot Reservoir | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 58 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 33 | Mud Lake Wildlife Management Area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 836.81 | Mean distance between banding and recapture | km | B | Adult | 111 | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 96.3 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 20 | Nests in heronry | No. nests | B | Adult | 20 | Brown County (45⁰ 40'N, 98⁰ 05'W) | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | Delaware Bay: 3.8, New York Harbor: 4.1, Cape Cod: 4.1, Boston Harbor: 4.0 | Clutch size | No. eggs/nest | B | Embryo | See citation | Various location in Atlantic North East | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | Delaware Bay: 79.3, New York Harbor: 85.0, Cape Cod: 84.6, Boston Harbor: 88.1 | Percent of successful nests | Percent successful nests | B | Embryo | Delaware Bay: 144, New York Harbor: 290, Cape Cod: 123, Boston Harbor: 54 | Various location in Atlantic North East | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Delaware Bay: 22.9, New York Harbor: 20.9, Cape Cod: 20.0, Boston Harbor: 17.9 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 3 | Number of nests | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 4 | Birds/2.4 ha | Birds/2.4 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Constructed wetlands, Palm Beach | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 304 [258.2-358.8 (95%CI)] | Nest abundance | Not reported | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Pterophyllum scalare, Ziphophorus maculatus, Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrod, Megalamphodus megalopterus, Poecilia reticulata, Helostoma temmincki, Puntius tetrazona, Epalzerohycnhos erythrurus, Hypostomus spp. | Fish species consumed from aquaculture ponds | B | Not Reported | See citation | Four commercial aquacutlure operations, Central Florida | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 2008: 2.86, 2009: 3.00, mean: 2.94 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 2008: 22, 2009: 29 nests, mean: 25.5 | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 2008: 0.15, 2009: 0.11, mean: 0.09 | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 88.0, 2009: 80.6 | Nest success | % | Hatchling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 87.5, 2009: 77.8 | Fledge success | % | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 2.3 | Mean fledged/nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.16 |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successful nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.11 | |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successfully fledged nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.09 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Crayfish: 15, small-bodies fishes: 90, larged-bodied fishes: 35, shrimp: 40, aquatic insects: 10, terrestrial insects: 10, garbage: 5, other vertebrates: 0 | Prey category | Frequency of use, % | Nestling | 20 | Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Palm Beach County |
Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 6B | Nesting pairs over time | Nesting pairs/yr | Adult | See citation | Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Long Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 0.4 | kg | B | Nestling | 10 | Georgia & South Carolina | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food Ingestion Rate | See ciation Figure 2 | Foraging success | Fish capture/strike | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Dietary Composition | Mummichog: 47, shore shrimp: 47, Atlantic silverside: 6 | % total | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 14.1, B: 11.4, C: 9.7 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.9, B: 1.5, C: 2.9 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 4.4, B: 3.8, C: 2.9 | Forearm growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A:0.3, B: 0.6, C: 0.7 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.8, B: 2.6, C: 2.0 | Trasus growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.3, C: 0.5 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.0, B: 1.7, C: 1.4 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.1, C: 0.2 |
Pacific Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Migration or Dispersal | See citation Table 1 "Last date in sounds" | Date of departure to overwinter in warmer water | Date | NR | Juvenile | 11 | Back Sound & Core Sound | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 50% kernel density estimate | km2 | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 15 | Dry Tortugas National Park | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 95% kernel density estimate | km2 | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 15 | Dry Tortugas National Park | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | Items identifed from gavage | Frequency | B | 94 | Tident Basin, Port Canaveral Inlet | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | Foregut contents of stranded individuals | Frequency | B | 169 | Middle coast: Colorado River-Mustand Island; Lower coast: North Padre Island-Mexico border | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 59.6 | % success | B | Hatchling | 972 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 39.5 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | % volume | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 10 | Pelagic | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | Frequency of occurrence, % | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 10 | Pelagic | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 7 | kg | NR | Not Reported | 10 | Big Bend, Citrus County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 1.7 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 1 | Abundance of nesters | See citation | East Island, French Frigate Shoals | Exposure Factor Datasets | Nesting | USA |
California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | West pond: 16, Imperial Reservoir: 2, Squaw Lake: 10, Senator Wash: 21, Small Island: 1, Ferguson Lake: 5, Unnamed areas: 5 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | West pond: 11, Imperial Reservoir: 1, Squaw Lake: 4, Senator Wash: 2, Small Island: 0, Ferguson Lake: 0, Unnamed areas: 2 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | West pond: 22, Imperial Reservoir: 1, Squaw Lake: 6, Senator Wash: 10, Small Island: 0, Ferguson Lake: 5, Unnamed areas: 10 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 9, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 9, Imperial Reservoir: 14, Large Island: 14, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 0 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 8, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 4, Imperial Reservoir: 2, Large Island: 0, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 0 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 10, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 12, Imperial Reservoir: 9, Large Island: 3, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 8 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | California Counties | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 2005: 0.36, 2006: 0.99 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | M | Adult | 2005: 1, 2006: 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | |
Home Range | 1.393057523 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | F | Adult | 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | |
Home Range | 2005: 0.80, 2006: 0.60 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | M | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 3 | Mid-Petaluma Marsh, 38⁰ 11' N, 122⁰ 33' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 0.12, 2006: 0.17 |
Home Range | 2005: 0.70, 2006: 0.44 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | F | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 3 | Mid-Petaluma Marsh, 38⁰ 11' N, 122⁰ 33' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 0.21, 2006: 0.07 |
Home Range | 2005: 0.51, 2006: 0.71 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | M | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 6 | Black John Slough, 38⁰ 08' N, 122⁰ 31' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 0.11, 2006: 0.17 |
Home Range | 2005: 0.55, 2006: 0.36 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | F | Adult | 2005: 6, 2006: 4 | Black John Slough, 38⁰ 08' N, 122⁰ 31' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 0.13, 2006: 0.05 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 86 | % hatched | % | B | Embryo | 128 | Jena, Dixie County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | California Counties | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 3900-7700 | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | San Pablo Bay | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | 160-250 | B | Outer Coast | Exposure Factor Datasets | Marin | USA | |
Population Density | 4100-8000 | B | Suisun Bay | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1.84 (pi=1), 3.68 (pi=0.5) | Density estimate | Rails/ha | Not Reported | Sierra Nevada foothills & Sacramento Valley | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.25 (pi=1), 0.50 (pi=0.5) |