Snowy Egret (Egretta thula)
Snowy Egret (Egretta thula)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Astyanax fasciatus: 19, Rhamdia guatemalensis: 7, Cyprindon variegatus: 9, Garmanella pulchra: 4, Gambusia yucatana: 6, Poecilia orri: 27, Xiphophorus maculatus: <1, Cichlasoma friedrichsthali: 3, Cichlasoma urophthalmus: 1, Cichlasoma meeki: 4, Cichlasoma octofasciatum: <1, Cichlasoma salvini: 4, Petenia splendida: 15, Decapoda (prawns): <1 | Percent biomass | % biomass | B | Nestling | 6 | Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan Peninsula | Exposure Factor Datasets | MEXICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 10 | Breeding pairs on island | Pairs | B | Adult | 10 | Oschner Island, Audobon Park, New Orleans | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Nesting | March 10-22 | B | Adult | See citation | Lake Okeechobee | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Population Density | See citation Table 2 | Number of nests | See citation | Lake Okeechobee | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Hatching Success | 1989: 83, 1990: 100, 1991: 80, 1992: 61 % | Nest success | % success | B | Adult | See citation | Lake Okeechobee | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Clutch or Litter Size | 1989: 3.5, 1990 & 1991: 3.3, 1992: 3.4 | Eggs per nest | Eggs/nest | B | Embryo | See citation | Lake Okeechobee | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 4 | Percent biomass | B | Nestling | See citation Table 1 | Lake Okeechobee | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foraging Distance | 6.2 | Mean flight distance | km | NR | Not Reported | 28 | North Indian River Lagoon | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.46 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation | Prey size | NR | Both Adults and Juveniles | Not reported | Brigantine National Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.7 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 11 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.65 | |
Hatching Success | Clutch size 2: 94.3, 3: 94.3, 4: 90.9 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Clutch size 2: 3, 3: 41: 4: 11 nests | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 3 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 60 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.56 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 3.1 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 49 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.52 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | 75 | Witchita area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | 75 | New York City area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | See citation Figure 5 | Percent hatching success | % | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of nests | No. nests | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Time of Hatching or Parturition | See citation Figure 3 | Julian date of hatching | Julian date | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 4 | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 53 | d | B | Chick | 20 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 3.7 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 0.919 | Weekly estimated survival rate | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.038 | ||
Survival/ Mortality | 0.833 | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.042 | |||
Foraging Distance | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 31 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | Review | Age at dispersal | d | B | Juvenile | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 56.3 | Chick age at dispersal | d | B | Chick | 22 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 5.6 |
Clutch or Litter Size | Eggs/nest | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Hatching or Parturition | April 13-23: 45, April 24-May 1: 16, May 2-21: 10 | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Time of Nesting | See citation Table 3 | Days between eggs laid | Days | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.9 | No. eggs laid March 23-May 2 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 77 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.06 |
Time of Hatching or Parturition | 22.1 | Incubation period | Days | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.17 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 28.8 | Mortality from laying through 10 d | % | Nestling | 65 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 42.5 | Mortality from laying through 2 w | % | Nestling | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Hatching Success | 82 | % | Embryo | 226 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 1 | Breeding pairs on islands in Boston Harbor | No. pairs | B | Adult | 2002: 66, 2003: 58 | Islands in Boston Harbor | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 1989: 95.3, 1990: 92.7 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 1989: 92.0, 1990: 93.0 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.553, 1990: 0.335 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.626, 1990: 0.587 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Mating/ Laying | See citation Figure 1 | Time of nesting activities (mating, laying, nesting) | Month | B | Adult | See citation | Isla Montague, northern Gulf of California | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | MEXICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Territory Size | Day 5: 97.0, days 15-45: 121.3, day 60: 124.9 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 8 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 66.7, days 15-45: 61.5, day 60: 53.9 |
Territory Size | Day 5: 37.2, day 15: 50.6, days 30-60: 52.5 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 11 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 30.2, day 15: 35.6, days 30-60: 39.4 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of active nests | Adult | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | ||
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 6 | Mean annual nest survivorship | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Figure 7 | Young in successful nests | Nestling | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.18, Outer Coast-a: 1.82, Outer coast-b: 1.75, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.49, San Pablo Bay-b: 2.46, Russian River-a: 2.37, Russian River-b: 2.38 | Mean young fledged in successful nests | Fledglings | Fledgling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.135, Outer Coast-a: 0.076, Outer coast-b: 0.086, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.059, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.046, Russian River-a: 0.060, Russian River-b: 0.048 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.03, Outer Coast-a: 1.27, Outer coast-b: 1.60, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.09, San Pablo Bay-b: 1.54, Russian River-a: 1.66, Russian River-b: 1.75 | Mean young produced in successful nests | Young | Nestling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.236, Outer Coast-a: 0.073, Outer coast-b: 0.193, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.119, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.136, Russian River-a: 0.103, Russian River-b: 0.128 | |
Time of Nesting | See citation Figure 10 | Intraseasonal nesting activity indexed by mean % nests | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 62 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 316 | Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 66 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 128 | Blackfoot Reservoir | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 58 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 33 | Mud Lake Wildlife Management Area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 836.81 | Mean distance between banding and recapture | km | B | Adult | 111 | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 96.3 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Gerridae: 1.3, Poecillidae: 18.3, Unidentified fish: 0.4,m Xiphocaris spp.: 78.4, Orthoptera: 1.3 | % total items | % total items | NR | Not Reported | 8 | Boqueron Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | PUERTO RICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 20 | Nests in heronry | No. nests | B | Adult | 20 | Brown County (45⁰ 40'N, 98⁰ 05'W) | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 3 | Number of nests | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | Delaware Bay: 3.8, New York Harbor: 4.1, Cape Cod: 4.1, Boston Harbor: 4.0 | Clutch size | No. eggs/nest | B | Embryo | See citation | Various location in Atlantic North East | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | Delaware Bay: 79.3, New York Harbor: 85.0, Cape Cod: 84.6, Boston Harbor: 88.1 | Percent of successful nests | Percent successful nests | B | Embryo | Delaware Bay: 144, New York Harbor: 290, Cape Cod: 123, Boston Harbor: 54 | Various location in Atlantic North East | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Delaware Bay: 22.9, New York Harbor: 20.9, Cape Cod: 20.0, Boston Harbor: 17.9 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 4 | Birds/2.4 ha | Birds/2.4 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Constructed wetlands, Palm Beach | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 304 [258.2-358.8 (95%CI)] | Nest abundance | Not reported | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1008 | Annual abundance | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Galveston Bay Estuary | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 581 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | Percent biomass | % | Nestling | 113 | Everglades | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1989: 90, 1998: 87, 1999: 94 | Active nests before/after oil spill in 1990 | No. of active nests | B | Adult | See citation | Isle of Meadows in Arthur Kill | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | Review: 4.633 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | CUBA | |||
Population Density | Review: 6.656 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | TRINIDAD/TOBOGO | |||
Population Density | Review: 2.993 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | COSTA RICA | |||
Population Density | Review: 0.225 | Relative abundance | 166 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ARGENTINA | |||
Population Density | Review: 0.082 | Relative abundance | 98 | Exposure Factor Datasets | URUGUAY | |||
Population Density | Review: 4.507 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | SURINAME | |||
Population Density | Review: 1.32 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | BRAZIL | |||
Population Density | Review: 285 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | COSTA RICA | |||
Population Density | Review: 1217 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | CUBA | |||
Population Density | Review: 43 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | SURINAME | |||
Population Density | Review: 325 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | TRINIDAD/TOBOGO | |||
Population Density | 2.92 | Mean relative abundance of 10 countires in the Americas | Cuba, Trinidad/Tobogo, Costa Rica, Argentina, Uruguay, Suriname, Brazil | Exposure Factor Datasets | 2.49 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 2.3 | Mean fledged/nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.16 |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successful nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.11 | |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successfully fledged nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.09 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2008: 2.86, 2009: 3.00, mean: 2.94 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 2008: 22, 2009: 29 nests, mean: 25.5 | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 2008: 0.15, 2009: 0.11, mean: 0.09 | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 88.0, 2009: 80.6 | Nest success | % | Hatchling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 87.5, 2009: 77.8 | Fledge success | % | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Crayfish: 15, small-bodies fishes: 90, larged-bodied fishes: 35, shrimp: 40, aquatic insects: 10, terrestrial insects: 10, garbage: 5, other vertebrates: 0 | Prey category | Frequency of use, % | Nestling | 20 | Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Palm Beach County |
Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 6B | Nesting pairs over time | Nesting pairs/yr | Adult | See citation | Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Long Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 0.4 | kg | B | Nestling | 10 | Georgia & South Carolina | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food Ingestion Rate | See ciation Figure 2 | Foraging success | Fish capture/strike | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Dietary Composition | Mummichog: 47, shore shrimp: 47, Atlantic silverside: 6 | % total | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 2009: 132, 2010: 216, 2011: 150, 2012: 30, 2013: 11 | Nests from flight rates & direct counts | No. nests | Adult | Bahia Kino, Sonora | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | MEXICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 14.1, B: 11.4, C: 9.7 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.9, B: 1.5, C: 2.9 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 4.4, B: 3.8, C: 2.9 | Forearm growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A:0.3, B: 0.6, C: 0.7 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.8, B: 2.6, C: 2.0 | Trasus growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.3, C: 0.5 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.0, B: 1.7, C: 1.4 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.1, C: 0.2 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Pterophyllum scalare, Ziphophorus maculatus, Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrod, Megalamphodus megalopterus, Poecilia reticulata, Helostoma temmincki, Puntius tetrazona, Epalzerohycnhos erythrurus, Hypostomus spp. | Fish species consumed from aquaculture ponds | B | Not Reported | See citation | Four commercial aquacutlure operations, Central Florida | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Chemical | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIREX | Not detected | Egg concentration | Embryo | Blackfoot Reservoir | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA | ||
<5 ppm: 81%, >5 ppm: 48% | Hatching success | Embryo | <5 ppm:27, >5 ppm: 29 eggs | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA | |||
MERCURY COMPOUNDS | LCRS: 30.64, reference site: 7.77 µg/g ww | Feather concentration | Nestling | LCRS:14, reference: 14 | LCRS: Carson Lake & Lahontan Reservoir; Reference site: Ruby Lake & Humboldt River | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA | |
MERCURY COMPOUNDS | See citation Table 3 | Blood chemistry | Not Reported | Nestling | See citation | Lahontan Reservoir & Humboldt River | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA |
MERCURY COMPOUNDS | 2002: 0.93, 2003: 0.93, 2004: 0.70 µg/g ww | Brain concentration | Not Reported | Nestling | 2002: 9, 2003: 7, 2004: 5 | Lahontan Reservoir | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA |
CIS-NONACHLOR | MS-90: 0.0233, BI-82: 0.103, BI-89: not detected, BI-90: 0.114, WM-91: not detected, SW-91: not detected µg/g ww | Egg concentration | Not Reported | Embryo | BI-82: 10, others: 5 | MS: Mallard Slough, Bair Island, WM: West Marin Island, SW: South Wilbur Flood Area | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA |
PCB | 0.08 ppm ww | Egg concentration | Embryo | 1 | Blackfoot Reservoir | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA | |
<5 ppm: 95%, >5 ppm: 86% | Young survived 7-10 days | Embryo | <5 ppm:27, >5 ppm: 29 eggs | Toxicity Factor Datasets | USA |