Species

Filter by Species

Filter by Toxicity Endpoint Type

Filter by Exposure Endpoint Type

Filter by Chemical

Filter by Location

Displaying 6201 - 6240 of 9478 datapoints
Export to CSV

Ensatina eschscholtzii

Citation:

Comparative studies on the distribution and foods of plethodontid salamanders in the redwood region of northern California

Author(s)
Bury, R.B. and M. Martin
Pages
331-335
Year
Issue
4
Volume
7
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition Collembola (68%); Coleoptera adults (49%); Coleoptera larvae (11%); Diptera adults (14%); Diptera larvae (16%); Hymenoptera (22%); Acarina (19%); Araneae (57%); Diplopoda (38%); Isopoda (32%) % frequency of major food items % Not Reported Both Adults and Juveniles 1-2 mi WSW of Pepperwood, Humboldt Co. 37 Exposure Factor Datasets

Citation:
Endpoint Value Toxicity Endpoint Type Type
39 TOX-MORT - dose-response data Toxicity Factor Datasets
LD50=0.9 mg/kg TOX-MORT - toxicity benchmarks Toxicity Factor Datasets
88% reduction in mean body wt. @ 7 ppm in food TOX-POP - size effects Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Responses of a deer mouse population to a forest herbicide application: reproduction, growth, and survival

Author(s)
Sullivan, Thomas P. and Druscilla S. Sullivan
Year
Volume
59
Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Location Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
increase and decrease (inconclusive) adult sex ratios Maple Ridge, BC 591 2.2 kg/ha TOX-POP - size effects NR field application Toxicity Factor Datasets

Lithobates catesbeianus

Citation:

Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-p-dioxin in larval and adult forms of Rana catesbeiana

Author(s)
Beatty, Patrick W., Myron A. Holscher and Robert A. Neal
Pages
578-581
Year
Issue
5
Volume
16
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (2,3,7,8-) no effect Not Reported Tadpole 15 animals/group 0, 25, 50,100, 200, 1000 ug/kg body weight TOX-MORT - dose-response data single intraperitoneal Toxicity Factor Datasets
TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (2,3,7,8-) no effect incidence of morphological abnormalities Not Reported Tadpole 15 animals/group 0, 25, 50,100, 200, 1000 ug/kg body weight TOX-REPRO - development single intraperitoneal Toxicity Factor Datasets
TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (2,3,7,8-) no effect Both Male and Female Adult 5 animals/group 0, 25, 50,100, 250, 500 ug/kg body weight TOX-MORT - dose-response data single intraperitoneal Toxicity Factor Datasets
TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (2,3,7,8-) no effect histopathological changes in liver, kidney, lung, heart and gonads Both Male and Female Adult 5 animals/group 0, 25, 50,100, 250, 500 ug/kg body weight TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects single intraperitoneal Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Effects of low concentrations of forest-use pesticides on frog embryos and tadpoles

Author(s)
Berrill, Michael, Susan Bertram, Lise McGillivray, Mark Kolohon and Bruce Pauli
Pages
657-664
Year
Issue
4
Volume
13
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
FENITROTHION no effect hatching success Not Reported Embryo 20 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - reproductive success 24 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
FENITROTHION no effect avoidance response assessed by daily prodding of newly hatched tadpoles Not Reported Embryo 20 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - behavior 24 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
TRICLOPYR no effect hatching success Not Reported Embryo 20 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - reproductive success 48 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
TRICLOPYR no effect avoidance response assessed by daily prodding of newly hatched tadpoles Not Reported Embryo 20 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - behavior 48 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
HEXAZINONE no effect hatching success Not Reported Embryo 20 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 100 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - reproductive success 8 d waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
HEXAZINONE no effect Not Reported Tadpole 10 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 100 mg/l (nominal) TOX-MORT - dose-response data 9 d waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
TRICLOPYR increase at 2.4 and 4.8 mg/l Not Reported Tadpole 10 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 mg/l (nominal) TOX-MORT - dose-response data 48 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
TRICLOPYR decrease response at 1.2 mg/l avoidance response assessed by daily prodding Not Reported Tadpole 10 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - behavior 48 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
FENITROTHION decrease response at 0.5 - 8 mg/l avoidance response assessed by daily prodding Not Reported Tadpole 10 animals/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 mg/l (nominal) TOX-REPRO - behavior 24 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Comparative sensitivity of amphibian tadpoles to single and pulsed exposures of the forest-use insecticide fenitrothion

Author(s)
Berrill, Michael, Susan Bertram, Bruce Pauli, Donna Coulson, Mark Kolohon and Dean Ostrander
Pages
1011-1018
Year
Issue
6
Volume
14
Chemical Endpoint Value Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
FENITROTHION increase at 9 mg/l Not Reported Tadpole 10/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 1, 2, 5, 9 mg/l (nominal) TOX-MORT - dose-response data 24 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
FENITROTHION increase at 9 mg/l Not Reported Tadpole 10/replicate; 3 replicates/dose 1, 2, 5, 9 mg/l (nominal) TOX-MORT - dose-response data 24 hr waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Acid tolerance of anuran embryos and larvae from central Ontario

Author(s)
Grant, Karen P. and Lawrence E. Licht
Pages
1-6
Year
Issue
1
Volume
27
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
SULFURIC ACID significant decrease at pH 3.5 and 4.0 hatching success Not Reported 50 eggs/replicate, 6 replicates/group (n=294-312) pH = 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 6.3 TOX-REPRO - reproductive success NR waterborne Toxicity Factor Datasets

Peromyscus maniculatus

Citation:

Responses of a deer mouse population to a forest herbicide application: reproduction, growth, and survival

Author(s)
Sullivan, Thomas P. and Druscilla S. Sullivan
Year
Volume
59
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
GLYPHOSATE decrease number of hardwood trees in study area Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Maple Ridge, BC 1 study area 2.2 kg/ha TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - indirect effects NR field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE no effect proportion of trapped animals in breeding condition Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Maple Ridge, BC 151 2.2 kg/ha TOX-REPRO - physiology NR field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increase survival over summer and winter Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Maple Ridge, BC 545 2.2 kg/ha TOX-MORT - mortality in the field NR field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE no effect juvenile growth rate (summer and fall) Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Maple Ridge, BC 283 2.2 kg/ha TOX-REPRO - physiology NR field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Glyphosate treatment and deer mice in clearcut and forest

Author(s)
Ritchie, D. Chris, Alton S. Harestad and Ralph Archibald
Year
Issue
3
Volume
61
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Technique Type
GLYPHOSATE 0.29 relative density (vs. control) in sprayed area Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Vancouver Island 285 1.1-1.2 kg/ha application TOX-POP - size effects field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE decrease percent vegetation cover (vs control) in study area Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Vancouver Island 285 1.1-1.2 kg/ha application TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - indirect effects field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE no effect adult sex ratios Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Vancouver Island 285 1.1-1.2 kg/ha application TOX-POP - size effects field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE no effect age structure as indicated by number of juveniles trapped Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Vancouver Island 285 1.1-1.2 kg/ha application TOX-POP - age distribution effects field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increase mean number of foeti in trapped females Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Vancouver Island 285 1.1-1.2 kg/ha application TOX-REPRO - reproductive success field application Toxicity Factor Datasets
Citation:

Influence of feeding chlorocholine chloride and glyphosine on selected immune parameters in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus

Author(s)
Olson, Leon J. and Ronald D. Hinsdill
Pages
103-114
Year
Volume
30
Chemical Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Tox Exposure Toxicity Endpoint Type Tox Exposure Duration Tox Exposure Technique Type
CHLOROCHOLINE CHLORIDE increase @ 1, 20, 80 mg/kg bw/d liver weight to bw ratio Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - organ/system effects 28 d diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
CHLOROCHOLINE CHLORIDE increase @ 1-80 mg/kg thymus weight to bw ratios Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - organ/system effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
CHLOROCHOLINE CHLORIDE increase @ 80 mg/kg bw/d white blood cell counts Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
CHLOROCHOLINE CHLORIDE increase @ 80 mg/kg bw/d plaque forming cells/g spleen Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
CHLOROCHOLINE CHLORIDE decrease @ 80 mg/kg bw/d reciprocal of hemolysin titers (against sheep rbc) Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increase @ 20, 80 mg/kg bw/d liver weight to body weight ratio Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - organ/system effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increased @ 1-80 mg/kg thymus weight to bw ratio Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - organ/system effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increase@ 80 mg/kg bw/d white blood cell count Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE increase @ 80 mg/kg bw/d plaque forming cell count/g spleen Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
GLYPHOSATE no effect reciprocal of hemolysin titer (against sheep rbc) Female Adult 12/dose 0, 1, 10, 20, 40, 80 mg/kg bw/d TOX-Non-Repro-Sublethal - cellular/biochemical effects 28 d Diet Toxicity Factor Datasets
Download CSV

Comment

Please let us know if the information on this page is helpful for you. Enter your comment and leave your email address if you would like to receive a response. Thank you!
OEHHA is subject to the California Public Records Act and other laws that require the release of certain information upon request. If you provide comments, please be aware that your name, address and e-mail may be available to third parties. In addition, all public comments will be posted on our web site upon the close of the comment period.
OEHHA California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment