Birds
Snowy Egret (Egretta thula)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.7 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 11 | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.65 | |
Hatching Success | Clutch size 2: 94.3, 3: 94.3, 4: 90.9 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Clutch size 2: 3, 3: 41: 4: 11 nests | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | 75 | Witchita area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | See citation Figure 5 | Percent hatching success | % | Embryo | See citation | Pea Patch Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 53 | d | B | Chick | 20 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 3.7 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 0.919 | Weekly estimated survival rate | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.038 | ||
Survival/ Mortality | 0.833 | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.042 | |||
Foraging Distance | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 31 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | Review | Age at dispersal | d | B | Juvenile | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Clutch or Litter Size | Eggs/nest | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Embryo | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 56.3 | Chick age at dispersal | d | B | Chick | 22 | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 5.6 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Hatching or Parturition | April 13-23: 45, April 24-May 1: 16, May 2-21: 10 | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Time of Nesting | See citation Table 3 | Days between eggs laid | Days | Embryo | 71 nests | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.9 | No. eggs laid March 23-May 2 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 77 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.06 |
Time of Hatching or Parturition | 22.1 | Incubation period | Days | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.17 | |
Survival/ Mortality | 28.8 | Mortality from laying through 10 d | % | Nestling | 65 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 42.5 | Mortality from laying through 2 w | % | Nestling | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | ||
Hatching Success | 82 | % | Embryo | 226 | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 1 | Breeding pairs on islands in Boston Harbor | No. pairs | B | Adult | 2002: 66, 2003: 58 | Islands in Boston Harbor | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 1989: 95.3, 1990: 92.7 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 1989: 92.0, 1990: 93.0 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.553, 1990: 0.335 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.626, 1990: 0.587 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Mating/ Laying | See citation Figure 1 | Time of nesting activities (mating, laying, nesting) | Month | B | Adult | See citation | Isla Montague, northern Gulf of California | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | MEXICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Territory Size | Day 5: 97.0, days 15-45: 121.3, day 60: 124.9 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 8 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 66.7, days 15-45: 61.5, day 60: 53.9 |
Territory Size | Day 5: 37.2, day 15: 50.6, days 30-60: 52.5 | Dispersal movement | km | B | Juvenile | 11 | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Day 5: 30.2, day 15: 35.6, days 30-60: 39.4 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of active nests | Adult | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | ||
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 6 | Mean annual nest survivorship | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Figure 7 | Young in successful nests | Nestling | See citation | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.18, Outer Coast-a: 1.82, Outer coast-b: 1.75, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.49, San Pablo Bay-b: 2.46, Russian River-a: 2.37, Russian River-b: 2.38 | Mean young fledged in successful nests | Fledglings | Fledgling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.135, Outer Coast-a: 0.076, Outer coast-b: 0.086, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.059, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.046, Russian River-a: 0.060, Russian River-b: 0.048 | |
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.03, Outer Coast-a: 1.27, Outer coast-b: 1.60, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.09, San Pablo Bay-b: 1.54, Russian River-a: 1.66, Russian River-b: 1.75 | Mean young produced in successful nests | Young | Nestling | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.236, Outer Coast-a: 0.073, Outer coast-b: 0.193, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.119, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.136, Russian River-a: 0.103, Russian River-b: 0.128 | |
Time of Nesting | See citation Figure 10 | Intraseasonal nesting activity indexed by mean % nests | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 62 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 316 | Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 66 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 128 | Blackfoot Reservoir | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Hatching Success | 58 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | 33 | Mud Lake Wildlife Management Area | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 836.81 | Mean distance between banding and recapture | km | B | Adult | 111 | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 96.3 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Gerridae: 1.3, Poecillidae: 18.3, Unidentified fish: 0.4,m Xiphocaris spp.: 78.4, Orthoptera: 1.3 | % total items | % total items | NR | Not Reported | 8 | Boqueron Wildlife Refuge | Exposure Factor Datasets | PUERTO RICO |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 20 | Nests in heronry | No. nests | B | Adult | 20 | Brown County (45⁰ 40'N, 98⁰ 05'W) | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 3 | Number of nests | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | Delaware Bay: 3.8, New York Harbor: 4.1, Cape Cod: 4.1, Boston Harbor: 4.0 | Clutch size | No. eggs/nest | B | Embryo | See citation | Various location in Atlantic North East | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Pterophyllum scalare, Ziphophorus maculatus, Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrod, Megalamphodus megalopterus, Poecilia reticulata, Helostoma temmincki, Puntius tetrazona, Epalzerohycnhos erythrurus, Hypostomus spp. | Fish species consumed from aquaculture ponds | B | Not Reported | See citation | Four commercial aquacutlure operations, Central Florida | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.0, B: 1.7, C: 1.4 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.1, C: 0.2 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 14.1, B: 11.4, C: 9.7 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.9, B: 1.5, C: 2.9 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 4.4, B: 3.8, C: 2.9 | Forearm growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A:0.3, B: 0.6, C: 0.7 |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.8, B: 2.6, C: 2.0 | Trasus growth | mm/d | B | Chick | 5 | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.3, C: 0.5 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 2008: 2.86, 2009: 3.00, mean: 2.94 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | 2008: 22, 2009: 29 nests, mean: 25.5 | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 2008: 0.15, 2009: 0.11, mean: 0.09 | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 88.0, 2009: 80.6 | Nest success | % | Hatchling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 2008: 87.5, 2009: 77.8 | Fledge success | % | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Hatching Success | 2.3 | Mean fledged/nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.16 |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successful nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.11 | |
2.8 | Mean fledged/successfully fledged nest | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | NE South Dakota | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.09 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | Review: 4.633 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | CUBA | |||
Population Density | Review: 6.656 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | TRINIDAD/TOBOGO | |||
Population Density | Review: 2.993 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | COSTA RICA | |||
Population Density | Review: 0.225 | Relative abundance | 166 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ARGENTINA | |||
Population Density | Review: 0.082 | Relative abundance | 98 | Exposure Factor Datasets | URUGUAY | |||
Population Density | Review: 4.507 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | SURINAME | |||
Population Density | Review: 1.32 | Relative abundance | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | BRAZIL | |||
Population Density | Review: 285 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | COSTA RICA | |||
Population Density | Review: 1217 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | CUBA | |||
Population Density | Review: 43 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | SURINAME | |||
Population Density | Review: 325 | Birds/ha | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | TRINIDAD/TOBOGO | |||
Population Density | 2.92 | Mean relative abundance of 10 countires in the Americas | Cuba, Trinidad/Tobogo, Costa Rica, Argentina, Uruguay, Suriname, Brazil | Exposure Factor Datasets | 2.49 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Crayfish: 15, small-bodies fishes: 90, larged-bodied fishes: 35, shrimp: 40, aquatic insects: 10, terrestrial insects: 10, garbage: 5, other vertebrates: 0 | Prey category | Frequency of use, % | Nestling | 20 | Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Palm Beach County |
Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 6B | Nesting pairs over time | Nesting pairs/yr | Adult | See citation | Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Long Island | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 0.4 | kg | B | Nestling | 10 | Georgia & South Carolina | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food Ingestion Rate | See ciation Figure 2 | Foraging success | Fish capture/strike | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Dietary Composition | Mummichog: 47, shore shrimp: 47, Atlantic silverside: 6 | % total | NR | Adult | Not reported | New Jersey & New York | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 2009: 132, 2010: 216, 2011: 150, 2012: 30, 2013: 11 | Nests from flight rates & direct counts | No. nests | Adult | Bahia Kino, Sonora | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | MEXICO |
California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis)
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Tables 14 & 15 | "Minimum density" | Individuals/36.2 m radius | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | See citation Table 15 | "Minimum density" | Individuals/36.2 m radius | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | 6914 | Estimated abundance | Individuals/5531 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 6914 | San Pablo Bay | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 5405 | Estimated abundance | Individuals/3780 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 5405 | Suisun & Carquinez | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 250 | Estimated abundance | Individuals/543 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | 250 | Outer Coast | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 3900-7700 | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | San Pablo Bay | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1.67 (pi=1), 3.35 (pi=0.5) | Density estimate | Not Reported | Sierra Nevada foothills & Sacramento Valley | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | 0.20 (pi=1), 0.41 (pi=0.5) |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Condition | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 35 | g | M | Adult | Monkey River | Exposure Factor Datasets | HONDURAS | |
Body Weight - Mean | 39.9 | g | F | Adult | Monkey River | Exposure Factor Datasets | Breeding | HONDURAS |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | California Counties | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 1 | Individuals/ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Concord Naval Weapsons Station | Exposure Factor Datasets | Contra Costa | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | California Counties | Countries | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foraging Distance | 2005: 23.1, 2006: 31.6 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | M | Adult | 2005: 1, 2006: 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 3.7, 2006: 6.4 |
Foraging Distance | 24.3 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | F | Adult | 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 3.8 |
Foraging Distance | 2005: 42.2, 2006: 25.8 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | M | Adult | 2005: 5, 2006: 6 | Mid-Petaluma Marsh, 38⁰ 11' N, 122⁰ 33' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 4.0, 2006: 1.8 |
Foraging Distance | 2005: 38.3, 2006: 20.2 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | F | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 4 | Mid-Petaluma Marsh, 38⁰ 11' N, 122⁰ 33' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 4.8, 2006: 1.6 |
Foraging Distance | 2005: 20.0, 2006: 26.8 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | M | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 6 | Black John Slough, 38⁰ 08' N, 122⁰ 31' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 1.6, 2006: 2.0 |
Foraging Distance | 2005: 26.9, 2006: 23.4 | Distance moved between daily observations | m | F | Adult | 2005: 7, 2006: 4 | Black John Slough, 38⁰ 08' N, 122⁰ 31' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 2.2, 2006: 1.9 |
Home Range | 2005: 0.36, 2006: 0.99 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | M | Adult | 2005: 1, 2006: 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | |
Home Range | 1.393057523 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | F | Adult | 1 | Gambinini Marsh, 38⁰ 12' N, 122⁰ 35' W1 | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | |
Home Range | 2005: 0.80, 2006: 0.60 | Fixed kernel (95%) | ha | M | Adult | 2005: 4, 2006: 3 | Mid-Petaluma Marsh, 38⁰ 11' N, 122⁰ 33' W | Exposure Factor Datasets | Sonoma | USA | 2005: 0.12, 2006: 0.17 |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 2 | Individuals observed | Individuals | NR | Not Reported | Crystal River State Buffer Preserve, Citrus County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 27 | Individuals observed | Individuals | NR | Not Reported | Weekiwachee Preserve, Hernando County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Population Density | 10 | Individuals observed | Individuals | NR | Not Reported | Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park, Pasco County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | West pond: 16, Imperial Reservoir: 2, Squaw Lake: 10, Senator Wash: 21, Small Island: 1, Ferguson Lake: 5, Unnamed areas: 5 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | West pond: 11, Imperial Reservoir: 1, Squaw Lake: 4, Senator Wash: 2, Small Island: 0, Ferguson Lake: 0, Unnamed areas: 2 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | West pond: 22, Imperial Reservoir: 1, Squaw Lake: 6, Senator Wash: 10, Small Island: 0, Ferguson Lake: 5, Unnamed areas: 10 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 9, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 9, Imperial Reservoir: 14, Large Island: 14, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 0 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 8, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 4, Imperial Reservoir: 2, Large Island: 0, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 0 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA | |
Population Density | Mittry Lake: 10, Gila Main Gravity Cancal seepage: 12, Imperial Reservoir: 9, Large Island: 3, Imperial National Wildlife Refuge: 8 | Individuals observed aurally | B | Not Reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Location | Type | Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 86 | % hatched | % | B | Embryo | 128 | Jena, Dixie County | Exposure Factor Datasets | USA |