Species
Filter by Species
Filter by Toxicity Endpoint Type
Filter by Exposure Endpoint Type
Filter by Chemical
Filter by Location
Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 | Mean fledged/successfully fledged nest | 0.09 | No. young fledged/nest | Fledgling | NE South Dakota | 2008: 25, 2009: 36 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Crayfish: 15, small-bodies fishes: 90, larged-bodied fishes: 35, shrimp: 40, aquatic insects: 10, terrestrial insects: 10, garbage: 5, other vertebrates: 0 | Prey category | Frequency of use, % | Nestling | Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Palm Beach County | 20 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 6B | Nesting pairs over time | Nesting pairs/yr | Adult | Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Long Island | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 0.4 | kg | B | Nestling | Georgia & South Carolina | 10 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food Ingestion Rate | See ciation Figure 2 | Foraging success | Fish capture/strike | NR | Adult | New Jersey & New York | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Dietary Composition | Mummichog: 47, shore shrimp: 47, Atlantic silverside: 6 | % total | NR | Adult | New Jersey & New York | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 2009: 132, 2010: 216, 2011: 150, 2012: 30, 2013: 11 | Nests from flight rates & direct counts | No. nests | Adult | Bahia Kino, Sonora | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 14.1, B: 11.4, C: 9.7 | Mass gain/day | By hatching order: A: 0.9, B: 1.5, C: 2.9 | g/d | B | Chick | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 4.4, B: 3.8, C: 2.9 | Forearm growth | By hatching order: A:0.3, B: 0.6, C: 0.7 | mm/d | B | Chick | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.8, B: 2.6, C: 2.0 | Trasus growth | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.3, C: 0.5 | mm/d | B | Chick | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Growth Rate | By hatching order: A: 2.0, B: 1.7, C: 1.4 | Culmen growth | By hatching order: A: 0.1, B: 0.1, C: 0.2 | mm/d | B | Chick | Lavaca Bay island, Calhoun County | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Range | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 1 to 5 | Eggs/nest | B | Embryo | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Mass gain/day | g/d | B | Embryo | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Growth Rate | See citation Table 3 | Culmen growth | mm/d | B | Embryo | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 1992: 22, 1993: 48 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 56.3 | Chick age at dispersal | 5.6 | d | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 22 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Time of Migration or Dispersal | 53 | 3.7 | d | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 20 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Survival/ Mortality | 0.919 | Weekly estimated survival rate | 0.038 | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Survival/ Mortality | 0.833 | 0.042 | B | Chick | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||||
Foraging Distance | Dispersal movement | 37.2 to 52.5 | km | B | Juvenile | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | 31 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Time of Migration or Dispersal | Review | Age at dispersal | d | B | Juvenile | Marsh islands near Chincoteague | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Territory Size | Day 5: 97.0, days 15-45: 121.3, day 60: 124.9 | Dispersal movement | Day 5: 66.7, days 15-45: 61.5, day 60: 53.9 | km | B | Juvenile | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | 8 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Territory Size | Day 5: 37.2, day 15: 50.6, days 30-60: 52.5 | Dispersal movement | Day 5: 30.2, day 15: 35.6, days 30-60: 39.4 | km | B | Juvenile | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | 11 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 62 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge | 316 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Hatching Success | 66 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Blackfoot Reservoir | 128 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Hatching Success | 58 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Mud Lake Wildlife Management Area | 33 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 3 | Number of nests | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 4 | Birds/2.4 ha | Birds/2.4 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Constructed wetlands, Palm Beach | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1008 | Annual abundance | 581 | Both Adults and Juveniles | Galveston Bay Estuary | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 3 | 0.56 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 60 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 3.1 | 0.52 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 49 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.7 | 0.65 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 11 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Hatching Success | Clutch size 2: 94.3, 3: 94.3, 4: 90.9 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Clutch size 2: 3, 3: 41: 4: 11 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 1989: 95.3, 1990: 92.7 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Hatching Success | 1989: 92.0, 1990: 93.0 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.553, 1990: 0.335 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.626, 1990: 0.587 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of active nests | Adult | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 6 | Mean annual nest survivorship | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Figure 7 | Young in successful nests | Nestling | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.18, Outer Coast-a: 1.82, Outer coast-b: 1.75, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.49, San Pablo Bay-b: 2.46, Russian River-a: 2.37, Russian River-b: 2.38 | Mean young fledged in successful nests | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.135, Outer Coast-a: 0.076, Outer coast-b: 0.086, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.059, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.046, Russian River-a: 0.060, Russian River-b: 0.048 | Fledglings | Fledgling | San Francisco bay area | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | Exposure Factor Datasets |