Species
Filter by Species
Filter by Toxicity Endpoint Type
Filter by Exposure Endpoint Type
Filter by Chemical
Filter by Location
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Territory Size | Day 5: 37.2, day 15: 50.6, days 30-60: 52.5 | Dispersal movement | Day 5: 30.2, day 15: 35.6, days 30-60: 39.4 | km | B | Juvenile | Saltmarsh islands, Chincoteague | 11 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 62 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge | 316 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Hatching Success | 66 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Blackfoot Reservoir | 128 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Hatching Success | 58 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Mud Lake Wildlife Management Area | 33 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 3 | Number of nests | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 4 | Birds/2.4 ha | Birds/2.4 ha | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Constructed wetlands, Palm Beach | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1008 | Annual abundance | 581 | Both Adults and Juveniles | Galveston Bay Estuary | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 3 | 0.56 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 60 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 3.1 | 0.52 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 49 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.7 | 0.65 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | 11 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Hatching Success | Clutch size 2: 94.3, 3: 94.3, 4: 90.9 | Percent laid that hatched | % | Embryo | Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, Brevard County | Clutch size 2: 3, 3: 41: 4: 11 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hatching Success | 1989: 95.3, 1990: 92.7 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Hatching Success | 1989: 92.0, 1990: 93.0 | % hatched of total laid | Embryo | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.553, 1990: 0.335 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | San Francisco Bay Area: Bair Island | 1989: 80, 1990: 96 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Survival/ Mortality | 1989: 0.626, 1990: 0.587 | Fledgling success | % hatched of total laid | Fledgling | San Francisco Bay Area: West Marin Island | 1989: 110, 1990: 116 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Figure 2 | Number of active nests | Adult | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Survival/ Mortality | See citation Figure 6 | Mean annual nest survivorship | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Figure 7 | Young in successful nests | Nestling | San Francisco bay area | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.18, Outer Coast-a: 1.82, Outer coast-b: 1.75, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.49, San Pablo Bay-b: 2.46, Russian River-a: 2.37, Russian River-b: 2.38 | Mean young fledged in successful nests | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.135, Outer Coast-a: 0.076, Outer coast-b: 0.086, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.059, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.046, Russian River-a: 0.060, Russian River-b: 0.048 | Fledglings | Fledgling | San Francisco bay area | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Clutch or Litter Size | Central San Francisco Bay: 2.03, Outer Coast-a: 1.27, Outer coast-b: 1.60, San Pablo Bay-a: 2.09, San Pablo Bay-b: 1.54, Russian River-a: 1.66, Russian River-b: 1.75 | Mean young produced in successful nests | Central San Francisco Bay: 0.236, Outer Coast-a: 0.073, Outer coast-b: 0.193, San Pablo Bay-a: 0.119, San Pablo Bay-b: 0.136, Russian River-a: 0.103, Russian River-b: 0.128 | Young | Nestling | San Francisco bay area | Central San Francisco Bay: 35, Outer Coast-a: 38, Outer coast-b: 15, San Pablo Bay-a: 160, San Pablo Bay-b: 103, Russian River-a: 97, Russian River-b: 53 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Time of Nesting | See citation Figure 10 | Intraseasonal nesting activity indexed by mean % nests | San Francisco bay area | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 304 [258.2-358.8 (95%CI)] | Nest abundance | San Francisco bay area | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Table 1 | Percent biomass | % | Nestling | Everglades | 113 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 1989: 90, 1998: 87, 1999: 94 | Active nests before/after oil spill in 1990 | No. of active nests | B | Adult | Isle of Meadows in Arthur Kill | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | New York City area | 75 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Dietary Composition | See citation Figure 2 | % of total | NR | Not Reported | Witchita area | 75 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time of Hatching or Parturition | April 13-23: 45, April 24-May 1: 16, May 2-21: 10 | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | 71 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Time of Nesting | See citation Table 3 | Days between eggs laid | Days | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | 71 nests | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.9 | No. eggs laid March 23-May 2 | 0.06 | Eggs/nest | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | 77 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Time of Hatching or Parturition | 22.1 | Incubation period | 0.17 | Days | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 28.8 | Mortality from laying through 10 d | % | Nestling | Riomar Island, Indian River County | 65 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 42.5 | Mortality from laying through 2 w | % | Nestling | Riomar Island, Indian River County | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Hatching Success | 82 | % | Embryo | Riomar Island, Indian River County | 226 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 836.81 | Mean distance between banding and recapture | 96.3 | km | B | Adult | 111 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Gerridae: 1.3, Poecillidae: 18.3, Unidentified fish: 0.4,m Xiphocaris spp.: 78.4, Orthoptera: 1.3 | % total items | % total items | NR | Not Reported | Boqueron Wildlife Refuge | 8 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 20 | Nests in heronry | No. nests | B | Adult | Brown County (45⁰ 40'N, 98⁰ 05'W) | 20 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | Delaware Bay: 3.8, New York Harbor: 4.1, Cape Cod: 4.1, Boston Harbor: 4.0 | Clutch size | No. eggs/nest | B | Embryo | Various location in Atlantic North East | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Fat (total or %) | 102 | 12 SE | g (lipid) | Female | Both Adults and Juveniles | Mingo Basin | 14 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Body Fat (total or %) | 168 | 8 SE | g (lipid) | Female | Both Adults and Juveniles | Mingo Basin | 32 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Body Fat (total or %) | 141 | 13 SE | g (lipid) | Female | Both Adults and Juveniles | Mingo Basin | 24 | Exposure Factor Datasets |