Species
Filter by Species
Filter by Toxicity Endpoint Type
Filter by Exposure Endpoint Type
Filter by Chemical
Filter by Location
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary Composition | Rodents: 64, lagomorphs: 61, deer: 35, carnivores: 56, pets: 41, soricomorphs: 10, unknown: 14, native seeds: 27, non-native seeds: 35, unknown seeds: 19, trash: 27 | Frequency by group | NR | Both Adults and Juveniles | Denver metro area | 64 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 6.6 | 2.2 | pups | B | Pup | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | 55 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Body Weight - Mean | See citation Figure 4 | Body mass by reproductive period | kg | F | Adult | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Body Fat (total or %) | See citation Figure 4 | Visceral fat index | F | Adult | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Body Weight - Mean | 10.1 | First year non-reproductive | 0.4 | kg | M | Juvenile | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Body Weight - Mean | 11.5 | First year reproductive | 0.2 | kg | M | Juvenile | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Body Weight - Mean | 12.5 | Adult reproductive | 0.3 | kg | M | Juvenile | Central Western, Northwestern, Great Valley, and Sierra Nevada bioregion | Not reported | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | Review | Reported weights across North America | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | See citation Table 1 | Number/km2 | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Naval Petroleum Reserve | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | See citation | Survival | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Naval Petroleum Reserve | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | See citation Table 6 | Pups/litter | B | Pup | Naval Petroleum Reserve | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Dietary Composition | Leporids: 44.1, kangaroo rats: 31.0, pocket mice: 1.2, antelope squirrels: 2.3, other rodents: 4.1, sheep: 0.8, birds: 2.5, snakes: 1.4, lizards: 0.1, orthopterans: 6.4, colopterans: 1.3, other arthropods: 0.1, other items: 6.9 | Frequency of occurrence | % | Both Adults and Juveniles | Naval Petroleum Reserve | 4393 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 2.69 | 0.3 | Pups/litter | B | Pup | Upper Chuckwalla Valley | 32 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survival/ Mortality | 80 | Mortality | % | B | Upper Chuckwalla Valley | 56 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Survival/ Mortality | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.868, pup-rearing: 0.944, dispersal: 1.000, annual: 0.752; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.891, pup-rearing: 1.000, annual: 0.892 | Survival | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.014, pup-rearing: 0.0.14, dispersal: 0.000, annual: 0.010; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.023, pup-rearing: 0.000, annual: 0.017 | M | Adult | Upper Chuckwalla Valley | 56 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.885, pup-rearing: 0.1.000, dispersal: 1.000, annual: 0.885; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.836, pup-rearing: 0.923, annual: 0.772 | Survival | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.0.033, pup-rearing: 0.000, dispersal: 0.0000, annual: 0.012; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.0.028, pup-rearing: 0.019, annual: 0.022 | F | Adult | Upper Chuckwalla Valley | 56 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.876, pup-rearing: 0..969, dispersal: 1.000, annual: 0.809; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.864, pup-rearing: 0.9640, annual: 0.833 | Survival | 2012-2013: pair formation: 0.019, pup-rearing: 0.001, dispersal: 0.000, annual: 0.012; 2013-2014: pair formation: 0.019, pup-rearing: 0.011, annual: 0.014 | B | Adult | Upper Chuckwalla Valley | 56 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | Rainy season: 0.10, dry: 0.18 | Estimated average density by season | individuals/km2 | NR | Not Reported | Sierra de Oaxaca | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Population Density | Cloud forest: 0.26, semi-evergreen forest: 0.01 | Estimated average density by vegetation type | individuals/km2 | NR | Not Reported | Sierra de Oaxaca | See citation | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Survival/ Mortality | Review | Daily survival | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Survival/ Mortality | Review | Annual survival index | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | Claytonville: 0.27, Halfway: 0.71, Olton: 0.63, Plainview: 0.10 | Individuals/12.8 sq km | Individuals/12.8 sq km | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Lamb/Hale/Swisher counties | 104 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Population Density | Claytonville: 0.36, Halfway: 0.59, Olton: 0.38, Plainview: 0.20 | Individuals/12.8 sq km | Individuals/12.8 sq km | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Lamb/Hale/Swisher counties | 104 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Survival/ Mortality | 1994: 0.40, 1995: 0.48 | Annual survival | % | B | Both Adults and Juveniles | Lamb/Hale/Swisher counties | 104 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clutch or Litter Size | 7 | Offspring/litter | B | Neonate | Delta Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Station | 3 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Clutch or Litter Size | 5.5 | Offspring/litter | B | Neonate | Delta Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Station | 11 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Survival/ Mortality | 97.9 | Survival >60 d post weaning | % | B | Delta Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Station | 93 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 1800 | g | F | Adult | Baja California | 1 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Error | Range | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body Weight - Mean | 29.5 | resident and non-resident males were not significantly different | 0.3 SE | kg | Male | Adult | Central coast | 22 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Body Weight - Mean | Individual data available in Table 2 | 8.2-24.1 | kg | Male | Juvenile | Central coast | 33 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Age at Sexual Maturity | 6.5 | 6-7 | yr | Male | Central coast | 22 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |||
Population Density | 15 | maximum density at this time of year | per 1000 ha | Male | Adult | Central coast | 7 | Exposure Factor Datasets | ||
Home Range | 40.3 | 4.0 SE | 23-65 | ha | Male | Adult | Central coast | 10 | Exposure Factor Datasets | |
Home Range | 78.0 | 7.2 SE | 55-95 | ha | Male | Adult | Central coast | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Endpoint Description | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population Density | 50 | resident population density (see citation for map of study area) | animals per study area | Both Male and Female | Not Reported | Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant; Point San Luis to Point Buchon | 15-170 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Population Density | 150 | population density for resident and non-resident animals (see citation for map of study area) | animals per study area | Both Male and Female | Not Reported | Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant; Point San Luis to Point Buchon | 15-170 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Dietary Composition | abalone (43%), crabs (16%), urchins (13%), other (28%) | The composition is based on occurrence of observed items. | Both Male and Female | Not Reported | Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant; Point San Luis to Point Buchon | 15-170 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Exposure Endpoint Type | Endpoint Value | Error | Units | Sex | Life Cycle Stage | Location | Sample Size | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Range | 5.6 | 1.9 SD | km^2 | Both Male and Female | Adult | Santa Cruz to San Luis Obispo | 9 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Home Range | 4.6 | 0.8 SD | km^2 | Male | Adult | Santa Cruz to San Luis Obispo | 5 | Exposure Factor Datasets |
Home Range | 6.8 | 2.3 SD | km^2 | Female | Adult | Santa Cruz to San Luis Obispo | 4 | Exposure Factor Datasets |