Species

Filter by Species

Filter by Toxicity Endpoint Type

Filter by Exposure Endpoint Type

Filter by Chemical

Filter by Location

Displaying 1681 - 1720 of 2236 datapoints
Export to CSV

Canis latrans

Citation:

Coyote diets associated with seasonal mule deer activities in California

Author(s)
Smith, James R.
Pages
78-82
Year
Volume
76
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition mule deer (7%); small mammals (67%); reptiles (11%); insects (8%); fruits (5%); other (21%) % frequency of food items in scats % Not Reported Not Reported Sierra National Forest (elev. 300 -3900 m) 60 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition mule deer (3%); small mammals (30%); birds (6%); reptiles (6%); insects (8%); fruits (64%); other (4%) % frequency of food items in scats % Not Reported Not Reported Sierra National Forest (elev. 300 -3900 m) 216 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition mule deer (3%); small mammals (18%); birds (2%); reptiles (2%); insects (2%); fruits (82%); other (1%) % frequency of food items in scats % Not Reported Not Reported Sierra National Forest (elev. 300 -3900 m) 199 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Summer food habits of coyotes in central Wyoming

Author(s)
Springer, Joseph Tucker and J. Steven Smith
Pages
449-456
Year
Volume
41
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition pronghorn antelope (55%); mule deer (5%), other native ungulate (3%); sciurids (21%); microtines (13%); cricetines (3%); unidentified cricetines (7%); western jumping mouse (1%); plant material (42%); coyote (22%); arthropods (18%) % frequency in scats % Not Reported Not Reported 404 scats Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Coyote foods in a coniferous forest in Oregon

Author(s)
Toweill, Dale E. and Robert G. Anthony
Pages
507-512
Year
Volume
52
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition rodents (36%); ungulates (26%); lagomorphs (23%); insectivores (2%); other mammals (1%); unidentified mammals (13%); birds (8%); reptiles (2%); insects (3%); fruit (38%); grass (13%); human refuse (1%) annual % frequency of occurrence in scats % Not Reported Not Reported Willamette National Forest, Lane County (elev., 500-1500 m) 844 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Coyote diets, five years later, at Cuyamaca Rancho State Park

Author(s)
Weintraub, Joel D.
Pages
152-157
Year
Volume
85
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition Scapanus latimanus (3%); Spermophilus beechyi (24%); Thomomys bottae (64%); Reithrodontomys megalotis (4%); Peromyscus sp. (19%); Neotoma spp. (4%); Microtus californicus (32%); Odocoileus hemionus (41%); birds (6%); reptiles (12%); arthropods (47%); vegetation (33%) % occurrence of major food items (>1%) in scats % Not Reported Not Reported East Mesa, Cuyamaca Rancho State Park (elev., 1525 m) 223 scats Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Population characteristics of coyotes (Canis latrans) in the northern Chihuahuan desert of New Mexico

Author(s)
Windberg, Lamar A., Steven M. Ebbert and Brian T. Kelly
Pages
197-207
Year
Volume
138
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Error Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Home Range 12.6 85% harmonic mean estimate of home range for "territorial" class 1.8 SE km2 Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Jornada Experimental Range, Dona Ana County (elev., 1320-1390 m) 13 Exposure Factor Datasets
Home Range 25.9 85% harmonic mean estimate of home range for "transient" class 6.5 SE km2 Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Jornada Experimental Range, Dona Ana County (elev., 1320-1390 m) 12 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 11.6 1.4 SE kg Male Adult Jornada Experimental Range, Dona Ana County (elev., 1320-1390 m) 21 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 9.5 1.0 SE kg Female Adult Jornada Experimental Range, Dona Ana County (elev., 1320-1390 m) 13 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Body size and condition of coyotes in southern Texas

Author(s)
Windberg, Lamar A., Richard M. Engeman and Jeffrey F. Bromaghin
Pages
47 - 52
Year
Volume
27
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Error Range Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Body Weight - Mean 7.6 0.2 SE kg Male Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 38 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 6.5 0.2 SE kg Female Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 40 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 9.1 0.2 SE kg Male Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 32 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 8.0 0.1 SE kg Female Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 50 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean range of means for two yearling age groups 10.0 - 10.8 kg Male Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 19-35 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean range of means for two yearling age groups 8.6 - 8.9 kg Female Juvenile Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 22 - 32 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean range of means for two adult age groups 10.6 - 11.4 kg Male Adult Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 69 - 76 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean range of means for two adult age groups; excluding those in latter half of gestation 9.1 - 9.6 kg Female Adult Webb County [lat., 27^o20'-28^o00N; long., 99^o00'-99^o40'W] 43-66 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Winter diets of coyotes in relation to prey abundance in southern Texas

Author(s)
Windberg, Lamar A. and Carl D. Mitchell
Pages
439-447
Year
Volume
71
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition lagomorphs (27 - 54%); woodrat (5-21%); cotton rat (0-40%); small rodents (4-12%); deer (4-19%); other prey (8 - 22%) range of percent distribution of prey items over 8 yrs % Not Reported Not Reported Webb County 2335 scats Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Survival of coyotes in southern Texas

Author(s)
Windberg, Lamar A., H. Leroy Anderson and Richard M. Engeman
Pages
301-307
Year
Volume
49
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Error Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Survival/ Mortality 0.70 overall annual survival rate (autumn-autumn), estimated over 4 yr periods 0.58 - 0.82 (95% CL) Both Male and Female Adult Webb County 88 Exposure Factor Datasets
Survival/ Mortality 0.42 overall annual survival rate (autumn-autumn), estimated over 3 yr periods 0.24 - 0.60 (95% CL) Both Male and Female Juvenile Webb County 38 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Dispersal, daily activity, and home range of coyotes in southeastern Idaho

Author(s)
Woodruff, Roger A. and Barry L. Keller
Pages
199-207
Year
Volume
56
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Error Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Home Range 29.3 estimated by modified minimum area method 2.4 SE km2 Female Adult Idaho National Engineering Laboratory 4 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Use of food items by sex and age classes of coyotes

Author(s)
Cypher, Brian L., Kenneth A. Spencer and Jerry H. Scrivner
Pages
42-47
Year
Volume
82
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition leporid (76.4%); rodent (18.0%); livestock (13.5%); bird (13.5%); insect (4.5%); other (14.6%) % frequency of occurrence in stomach contents % Both Male and Female Adult Naval Petroleum Reserves (elev., 88-473m) [lat., 35^oN; long., 119^oN] 89 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition leporid (57.6%); rodent (27.1%); livestock (27.1%); bird (20.3%); insect (11.9%); other (25.4%) % frequency of occurrence in stomach contents % Both Male and Female Juvenile Naval Petroleum Reserves (elev., 88-473m) [lat., 35^oN; long., 119^oN] 59 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition leporid (62.7%); rodent (19.4%); livestock (17.9%); bird (14.9%); insect (41.8%); other (26.9%) % frequency of occurrence in stomach contents % Both Male and Female Juvenile Naval Petroleum Reserves (elev., 88-473m) [lat., 35^oN; long., 119^oN] 59 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Summer food habits of coyotes in Idaho's River of No Return Wilderness Area

Author(s)
Elliott, Charles E. and Richard Guetig
Pages
63 - 65
Year
Volume
50
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition Columbian ground squirrel (56.85); mule deer (27.4%); deer mouse (15.6%); moose (13.7%); northern pocket gopher (11.7%); montane vole (11.7%); golden-mantled ground squirrel (5.8%); Audubon's cottontail (3.9%); horse (3.9%); unknown mammals (5.8%); reptiles (3.9%); arthropods (39.2%); birds (27.4%); plants (21.5%) % occurrence of major (>1.9%) food items in scats % Not Reported Not Reported Big Creek Ranger District 51 scats Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Food habits of the coyote in California

Author(s)
Ferrel, Carol M., Howard R. Leach and Daniel F. Tillotson
Pages
301-341
Year
Volume
39
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Dietary Composition rodent (33.2%); deer (17.0%); other stock (14.8%); rabbit (13.2%); misc. (10.0%); sheep (4.6%); bird (3.8%); vegetation (3.4%) overall % volume of stomach contents % Not Reported Not Reported coastal region 407 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition rodent (27.0%); deer (18.3%); other stock (9.4%); rabbit (22.2%); misc. (10.5%); sheep (6.7%); bird (5.0%); vegetation (0.9%) overall % volume of stomach contents % Not Reported Not Reported northeast region 611 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition rodent (24.5%); deer (11.4%); other stock (12.1%); rabbit (22.9%); misc. (10.5%); sheep (9.7%); bird (3.4%); vegetation (5.5%) overall % volume of stomach contents % Not Reported Not Reported inland Sierra region 813 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition rodent (19.2%); deer (5.0%); other stock (12.4%); rabbit (41.5%); misc. (12.4%); sheep (6.6%); bird (2.1%); vegetation (0.8%) overall % volume of stomach contents % Not Reported Not Reported eastern region 94 Exposure Factor Datasets
Dietary Composition rodent (24.4%); deer (9.2%); other stock (7.6%); rabbit (26.4%); misc. (10.3%); sheep (5.3%); bird (8.2%); vegetation (8.6%) overall % volume of stomach contents % Not Reported Not Reported southern region 297 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Evaluation of several indices for assessment of coyote (Canis latrans) body composition

Author(s)
Huot, Jean, Marie-Lazarine Poulle and Michel Crete
Pages
1620-1624
Year
Volume
73
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Error Range Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Body Fat (total or %) 12.08 body fat content 7.36 SD 1.70 - 26.72 % Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Quebec 22 Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Densities of coyotes at the interface of Saguaro National Monument and Tucson, Arizona

Author(s)
McClure, Mark F., Norman S. Smith and William W. Shaw
Pages
83-86
Year
Volume
41
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Description Range Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Population Density range over 6 counting periods 3.2 - 4.6 #/km2 Both Male and Female Not Reported Saguaro National Monument 28-40/period Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Age distribution and weights of coyotes in northwestern Texas

Author(s)
Meinzer, Wyman P. and Fred S. Guthery
Pages
275-278
Year
Volume
25
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Body Weight - Mean 7.9 (0.5yr); 9.8 (1.5 yr); 11.0 (2.5 yr); 11.5(3.5 yr); 10.8 (4.5 yr); 11.6 (5.5 yr); 10.4 (6.5 yr); 10.9 (>7.5 yr) average body weights at various ages kg Female Both Adults and Juveniles King and Knox counties 3 - 121/age Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Weight - Mean 8.2 (0.5yr); 10.4 (1.5 yr); 12.8 (2.5 yr); 13.2 (3.5 yr); 13.7 (4.5 yr); 12.5 (5.5 yr); 12.1 (6.5 yr); 12.6 (>7.5 yr) average body weights at various ages kg Male Both Adults and Juveniles King and Knox counties 8 - 76/age Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Seasonal variation in body mass and composition of eastern coyotes

Author(s)
Poulle, Marie Lazarine, Michel Crete and Jean Huot
Pages
1625 - 1633
Year
Volume
73
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Error Range Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Location Sample Size Type
Body Fat (total or %) 9.5 1.3 3.4 - 25.2 % Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Quebec 36 Exposure Factor Datasets
Body Fat (total or %) 16.8 1.8 5.3 - 34.8 % Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Quebec Not Reported Exposure Factor Datasets
Citation:

Ecology of coyotes in Iowa

Author(s)
Andrews, Ronald D. and Edward K. Boggess
Pages
249-265
Publisher
Academic Press
Year
Exposure Endpoint Type Endpoint Value Endpoint Description Range Units Sex Life Cycle Stage Sample Size Type
Time of Mating/ Laying Jan. - Apr. breeding Both Male and Female Adult Not Reported Exposure Factor Datasets
Clutch or Litter Size range of 5 yearly averages 5.12 - 6.90 pups/litter Female Adult 5 yrs Exposure Factor Datasets
Survival/ Mortality 60.9 mean survival rate estimated from population age structure data % Both Male and Female Both Adults and Juveniles Not Reported Exposure Factor Datasets
Download CSV

Comment

Please let us know if the information on this page is helpful for you. Enter your comment and leave your email address if you would like to receive a response. Thank you!
OEHHA is subject to the California Public Records Act and other laws that require the release of certain information upon request. If you provide comments, please be aware that your name, address and e-mail may be available to third parties. In addition, all public comments will be posted on our web site upon the close of the comment period.
OEHHA California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment